01 / 03
What models say now
We run the questions your buyers actually ask (category, problem, comparison, and direct) across the models your customers use, and record the verbatim answers.
WebJazz: AI Visibility Engine
When your buyer asks an AI who to trust, is your name in the answer?
One engine. Four assistants. We measure your visibility in the answers your buyers actually use.
Run a free audit of any domain and see what AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity say about your business, plus exactly which sources decide it. You get a letter grade and a ranked fix list, in under 30 seconds, no signup.
This is what a model says about a category right now.
A verbatim answer, unretouched. The names in highlight are competitors; the gap is where a brand is missing.
Cherry Creek Dental Studio: known for high-end cosmetic dentistry and a spa-like experience in the heart of Denver.
Lowry Implant & Cosmetic Dentistry: a top choice for advanced implant procedures and comprehensive restorative care.
University Dental Center: trusted for gentle, modern general dentistry near the University of Denver with a focus on patient comfort.
Two of the three businesses named here are on that list because they're cited in sources your team can act on. You're not on the list. Here's the ranked source set that decides it.
How WebJazz works
02 / 03
Which sources decide it
Every answer is traced back to the ~20–30 recurring pages that ground it: listicles, review platforms, directories, forums, and the two or three blogs that happen to rank. We rank them by how often they're cited. Most brands are absent from two-thirds of them.
03 / 03
Today's three actions, drafts attached
Each day you get a short queue (1 to 3 actions, never more) with the work already drafted: the passage to publish on your own site, the listicle pitch ready to send, the review question engineered to elicit a specific claim. You review; you decide; you send. Nothing posts to third-party surfaces automatically, by design.
Example of what a drafted action looks like: ships Q4 2026, see the roadmap below:
Add a page: "Same-day emergency dental care in Denver" (300 words). Lead sentence: "Same-day emergency appointments: call before 11am and we'll see you today."
Why this action: the captured answer names three practices (cosmetic, implant, and general), and none of their cited passages claims emergency availability. A model answering "which dentist can see me today" needs exactly that claim, and no cited source provides it. One page, one extractable claim, ships on your own site. Draft attached; you review, you decide, you send.
Real result, real site
tuckersayz.com went from F to A in one day.
We run the same engine on our own properties before we sell it. Here is the actual, re-runnable proof: the audit history for tuckersayz.com as our team closed the gaps.
- F39First audit: no robots directives, no llms.txt, no sitemap, no schema, no canonical.
- C75Shipped robots.txt (4 AI crawlers), llms.txt, sitemap.xml, canonical + meta.
- C+79Added FAQ + schema.org (FAQPage/Organization) and markdown negotiation for AI crawlers.
- A96Anchored claims to real sources; specific, verifiable copy. 8 of 9 failing checks closed.
What the engine shipped for that site
- robots.txt explicitly permits GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended
- llms.txt + llms-full.txt served for AI crawlers
- sitemap.xml listing real pages, referenced from robots.txt
- rel=canonical, meta description, Open Graph, schema.org JSON-LD
- Markdown negotiation on Accept: text/markdown
- Homepage copy rewritten to specific, verifiable claims
Built for the way models actually find you
One core engine applies to everyone. Persona checks are packs on top: your vertical is a module inside an architecture, not the whole company.
01 / 04
Shipping nowCore
Can a model find you, resolve who you are, and extract specific claims about you? Checks robots.txt, clean HTML, schema.org, entity consistency, claim density, canonical/sitemap hygiene, and llms.txt.
02 / 04
Shipping nowLocal / multi-location
For businesses with locations and a Google Business Profile to protect. Checks profile claim and category, NAP consistency across directories, presence in the vertical's top aggregators, review-detail density, per-location page uniqueness, and Wikidata / knowledge-panel accuracy.
03 / 04
Planned, Q4 2026Developer / SaaS
OpenAPI discoverability, MCP server, package registry metadata, a quickstart that runs unedited, docs as markdown. Not built yet: shown so you know the architecture is shared, not bespoke.
04 / 04
Shipping nowExecutive / personal
Person identity and on-page authored-content attribution, plus Wikidata presence. Shipping now as a free-audit experiment: run it on any public name, no signup. For people, not companies: not the managed program at a discount.
Run a free person auditPricing
Every tier is published, including the ones that don't exist yet. You'll see exactly what's available now and what's opening, by quarter.
Available now
Readiness audit
$0 Free
- Public audit of any domain, no signup
- Re-runnable, shareable grade
- Ranked fix list with effort in hours
- Embeddable badge for A/B scores
Run it on yourself. Run it on a competitor. The score is the free sample.
Opening Q4 2026
Self-serve
$149 /mo
- Tracking across the models you care about
- The daily queue with drafted actions: we draft, you decide, you send
This tier is not open yet. When it opens, the self-serve user executes the actions; it does not include a person doing outreach for you.
For teams that want the queue and the drafts, and do the placement themselves.
Available now
Managed
from $1,500 /mo
- Everything in self-serve
- A person executing the third-party work: listicle pitches, directory placements, review outreach
- Manual digital PR priced as a real cost line
For teams that want the work done.
Available now
Baseline audit
$2,500–$5,000 one-time
- A fixed-scope, 2-week engagement
- Verbatim screenshots of what models say about you across the questions your buyers ask
- The ranked list of the ~20–30 sources per category that decide those answers
- Standalone, or credited toward Managed
Early-access captures are taken by hand in the live consumer interface (the same surface your buyers use) and screenshotted verbatim. Capture method is recorded on every response, and the two methods are never mixed or presented as one another.
Run the baseline before you decide anything. If the picture is bad, you want the ongoing program. If it's fine, you've spent a rounding error to confirm it.
Early access: opening with the self-serve tier (Q4 2026)
Auto-Pilot The loop runs itself: you review what it drafts.
$49 /mo per covered domain
- Continuous AI-visibility monitoring: the readiness audit re-runs on each covered domain's cadence, appended, never overwriting the frozen baseline
- Tier-1 deterministic technical/meta fixes auto-apply on owned domains you give us access to: real repo edits, re-audit-verified
- Tier-2 content drafts accumulate into a weekly approve-all gate: nothing publishes without your OK
- Before/after reporting from real persisted audit runs: zero movement is reported as zero
The demo is our own site's before/after curve: the audit says A/96 with one content gap; the loop runs the re-measure and reports the real movement, zero reported as zero.
An add-on to any plan. The loop runs itself: you review what it drafts.
The loop's autonomy policy is code-enforced, not a promise: Tier-1 technical fixes auto-apply on owned domains only; Tier-2 drafts wait for your weekly approval; Tier-3 third-party/community drafts are draft-only forever.
We will never promise you a specific visibility multiple. Category norms advertise 3–5x first-month lifts; those are self-published and selection-biased. We promise process, evidence, and honest measurement.
Roadmap
Next three shipments, dated, plain. We publish dates we intend to hit: and will.
- 01Live nowReadiness audit live: public, free, no signup. This site passes its own audit at A.
- 02Live nowDaily engine shipping drafts: the 1–3-actions-a-day queue with drafts attached, for managed clients and agencies.
- 03Q4 2026Self-serve tier opens: $149/mo tracking + daily queue, you execute.
- 04ContinuousShipped by the WebJazz agent fleet: features land in days, not quarters. Every release is verified by a human before it ships.
Dates are commitments we intend to meet, not marketing. If a date slips, we say so and republish.
Evidence: the real facts
Proof you can see, share, and act on.
- The readiness audit is free: $0, no signup, results in minutes.
- Run it on any public domain, including a competitor's, for $0.
- Re-run the free audit any time to watch the score move as you make fixes.
- Share the report with your team, your client, or your board, for free.
- A free audit reads the same content and answer engines your buyers actually use.
- It checks your text, your schema, and the verbatim answers models give about you, for $0.
- Every answer is traced to the sources that ground it, so you know what to influence, at $0.
- Findings are ranked by impact, so you fix what matters first, on a free report.
- Drafted fixes arrive with the $149-per-month self-serve tier, which opens in Q4 2026.
- You get a short queue of 1 to 3 drafted actions a day with the $149 self-serve tier, never a firehose.
- Nothing posts to third-party surfaces automatically; drafts wait for a human review, even in Q4 2026.
- We run the same strict checks, free, on our own site before we run them on yours.
- Few companies in this category publish their own grade; we do, at A, and you can re-run the $0 audit yourself.
- The audit is strict by design: it penalizes vague language, blocked crawlers, and thin markup, at $0.
- The free readiness audit is the sample; the full product starts at $149 per month in Q4 2026.
- A baseline audit is a fixed-scope, 2-week engagement priced at $2,500-$5,000, one-time.
- Managed starts from $1,500 per month and includes a person executing the third-party work.
- Auto-Pilot is an add-on at $49 per month per covered domain, opening with the self-serve tier.
- The answer block on this homepage is a real capture from August 14, 2026, via the DeepSeek API.
- Every captured response stores its capture method and parser version, and the two methods are never mixed.
- The tuckersayz.com proof run closed 8 of 9 failing checks in one day, an audit history anyone can re-run.
- Tier-1 technical fixes auto-apply on owned domains only, in the $49-per-month Auto-Pilot add-on.
- Tier-2 content drafts accumulate into a weekly approve-all gate, so nothing publishes without your OK, even in Q4 2026.
- The early-access list is read by a person, and we only email you about the $149 tier opening.
- "Same-day emergency appointments: call before 11am and we'll see you today" is the kind of specific claim this engine checks for.
- The self-serve tier is not open yet; it opens Q4 2026, and the beta list gets emailed first.
- One-time baseline engagements capture verbatim screenshots over a fixed 2-week scope, priced $2,500-$5,000.
- The readiness audit, at $0, is re-runnable and shareable.
- Q4 2026 ships the self-serve tier: $149 per month for tracking plus the daily queue.
- Auto-Pilot's weekly approve-all opens Q4 2026 at $49 per month per covered domain.
- Every tier is published by quarter, including tiers not open yet, like the $149 self-serve tier.
- You keep the report either way: no install, no lock-in, and the audit stays at $0.
We grade ourselves first.
A+
This site runs the same audit you just used. No other company in this category publishes its own grade. Most would fail it: our product penalizes JS-rendered content, blocked crawlers, thin schema, and vague marketing language, so our own site has to be exactly what we sell.
Full report: /a/0nxmbwkfia
Questions we get asked
- What does the audit check?
- Can a model find you, resolve who you are, and extract specific claims: seven core checks plus a local-services pack.
- Is the audit free?
- Yes, no signup, re-runnable, shareable.
- Do you post to social media for me?
- No. We draft; you decide. Nothing posts to third-party surfaces automatically.
Found a gap you want to close?
If there's a gap in your AI visibility, tell us what you're seeing and we'll tell you plainly what it would take to close it.
How we measure
Prompt set: 40–80 questions per vertical, in four types: category ("best X near me"), problem (how the buyer describes the pain before knowing the category), comparison ("X vs Y"), and direct brand.
Capture: Real answers stored verbatim; capture method recorded on every response. API data is labeled API; early-access baselines are verbatim screenshots of the live consumer interface, taken by hand. Never mixed in one number.
Parsing: One structured parse per response (mentions, cited URLs, position, sentiment) with a parser version on every row so history can be re-read honestly.
Target list: Citation sources ranked by frequency across the prompt set; ~20–30 recurring sources per vertical.
The queue: 1–3 actions daily, every action generated from gap data, every draft reviewed and sent by a human. Nothing auto-posts to third-party surfaces, ever. We say it plainly because it's our trust argument, not a limitation to hide.
What we store: We store verbatim model answers and the source list that grounds them, with the capture method recorded on every response: API captures labeled API; early-access baselines are hand-captured screenshots of the live consumer interface, never mixed in one number. Nothing posts to third-party surfaces automatically.